Benchmarks of 5.4 and 6.0 on a 6-CPU host (HP Netserver LT
6000r)
Julian Elischer
julian at elischer.org
Thu Jan 12 11:06:13 PST 2006
David Landgren wrote:
> List,
>
> A while back, I mentioned that I was going to bring a six-processor
> box (an HP Netserver LT 6000r) from 5.x to 6.0-STABLE, and someone
> asked for some before and after benchmarks. With the recent spate of
> advisories, I figured it was time to recompile the world, which gave
> me the chance to perform the other side of the benchmark, to see how
> 6.0 performs.
>
> The benchmark was of course to buildworld and buildkernel.
>
> Back in november I was running a reasonably recent 5.4-STABLE. I first
> ran the build with -j12 to give the system a workout, and then
> afterwards without, for the real thing. Each time I moved /usr/obj to
> /usr/obj-old, in order to have a fresh /usr/obj directory tree created
> each time. (In fact, I didn't have much choice in the matter: cruft
> from 5.4 builds or something or other cause the very first make to
> fail. Zapping /usr/obj fixed that).
>
> In all cases the machine was very lightly loaded.
>
> 5.4-STABLE compilation times
> ----------------------------
>
> # Build world, 12 processes:
> time env -i make -j12 -DALWAYS_CHECK_MAKE buildworld
> real 43m28.093s
> user 152m18.214s
> sys 41m6.976s
>
> # Build word, normal:
> time env -i make -DALWAYS_CHECK_MAKE buildworld
> real 157m46.084s
> user 143m20.122s
> sys 17m53.311s
>
> # Build kernel, 12 processes:
> time env -i make -j12 -DALWAYS_CHECK_MAKE buildkernel KERNCONF=PROFANE
> real 18m30.613s
> user 30m46.221s
> sys 6m0.858s
>
> # Build kernel, normal:
> time env -i make -DALWAYS_CHECK_MAKE buildkernel KERNCONF=PROFANE
> real 32m51.860s
> user 29m53.228s
> sys 3m30.556s
>
> 6.0-STABLE compilation times
> ----------------------------
>
> # Build world, 12 processes:
> time env -i make -j12 -DALWAYS_CHECK_MAKE buildworld
> real 43m40.423s
> user 155m43.345s
> sys 30m15.898s
>
> (Of note, system time has declined by 25%)
>
> # Build word, normal:
> time env -i make -DALWAYS_CHECK_MAKE buildworld
> real 160m28.020s
> user 146m26.300s
> sys 16m4.736s
>
> (No difference)
>
> # Build kernel, 12 processes:
> time env -i make -j12 -DALWAYS_CHECK_MAKE buildkernel KERNCONF=PROFANE
> real 18m12.984s
> user 31m31.825s
> sys 4m26.606s
>
> (again, a clear reduction of 25%)
>
> # Build kernel, normal:
> time env -i make -DALWAYS_CHECK_MAKE buildkernel KERNCONF=PROFANE
> real 33m30.404s
> user 30m42.769s
> sys 2m52.994s
>
> (no difference)
>
> So my naive reading of the above is yes, the kernel 6.0 is quite a bit
> more efficient on multiprocessor systems, the more the machine is
> loaded, the more the difference.
but the real times didn't change.. (in fact got a bit worse in some
cases) which I guess is something
that could be looked at..
did you build in a chroot so athat the same tools were being used both
times :-)
>
> David Landgren
More information about the freebsd-smp
mailing list