nanobsd disk info
Paul Schenkeveld
fb-small at psconsult.nl
Tue Mar 22 16:23:07 PST 2005
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 11:23:52AM -0500, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 09:24:53PM +0100, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 11:51:07AM -0500, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm obviously missing something here.
> > >
> > > I'm trying to get nanobsd on a 512Mb flash card. The only changes
> > > I've made are to set kernconf = net4801 in make.conf and to set the
> > > Makefile disk geometry variables. "make" chokes on the disk geometry,
> > > so I'm assuming I've set it wrong.
> > >
> > > My diskinfo shows as:
> > >
> > > mwl-crash2~;sudo diskinfo -v da0
> > > da0
> > > 512 # sectorsize
> > > 512483840 # mediasize in bytes (489M)
> > > 1000945 # mediasize in sectors
> > > 488 # Cylinders according to firmware.
> > > 64 # Heads according to firmware.
> > > 32 # Sectors according to firmware.
> >
> > Somehow these numbers are not consistent:
> >
> > 488 cyls * 64 heads * 32 secs = 999424 secs
>
> Doh, of course. I've never seen a hard drive lie to me before, didn't
> occur to me to check these numbers.
>
> > What does dmesg show about da0?
>
> da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
> da0: <Generic STORAGE DEVICE 0.01> Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device
> da0: 1.000MB/s transfers
> da0: 488MB (1000945 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 488C)
>
> I get the same results when I try on a separate machine. I also get
> the same results when I use a second identical flash card.
>
> Any suggestions or pointers? How can I deal with a flash card that's
> obviously lying or brain-dead? I apparently don't know the right
> Google keywords, because I can't find a solution there...
So what if you just put the following in:
HD?=64
SC?=32
SECTS?=999424
which would match the 488 cylinders reported by dmesg and diskinfo.
Hope you're not desperately trying to squeeze the last bytes out ;-)
> ==ml
Regards,
Paul Schenkeveld
More information about the freebsd-small
mailing list