Atom C2758 - loading aesni(4) reduces performance
RW
rwmaillists at googlemail.com
Mon May 25 12:10:20 UTC 2015
On Mon, 25 May 2015 13:41:31 +0200
Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> ## Kevin Day (toasty at dragondata.com):
>
> > > If you have cryptodev loaded, this is to be expected as OpenSSL
> > > will use /dev/crypto instead of the AES-NI instructions.. Just
> > > don't load cryptodev and you'll be fine..
> >
> > So to make sure I?m understanding? openssl has native AES-NI
> > support, and it also can use /dev/crypto. It?s
> > preferring /dev/crypto, but /dev/crypto has much higher overhead?
>
> Yes (I hadn't thought of cryptodev, because "why would one load that
> without really special crypto hardware?").
> The overhead is obvious - when offloading the crypto operations to
> the kernel, the benefit of the kernel/hardware crypto support has
> to be better than the penalty of communicating with the kernel; and
> as you already have AES-NI support in openssl, there's not that much
> chance that the kernel is that much faster than openssl itself.
But AFAIK you need the crypto module for AES-NI support in geli.
Is there any way to have both work optimally?
More information about the freebsd-security
mailing list