bind9 and CVE-2013-4854

Mon Jul 29 10:09:04 UTC 2013

On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 12:03:43PM +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> A question related to this:
> 
> What is it that prevents BIND from being removed from the base when
> there are very well working ports of BIND already that are far easier
> to update when vulnerabilities are found. Is it the dig(1), host(1)
> and nslookup(1) utilities?

Yes.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/attachments/20130729/df41ddd8/attachment.sig>