svn commit: r239569 - head/etc/rc.d

[David O'Brien]

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 08:53:02PM +0100, RW wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:28:51 +0200 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> > so none of it is discarded.  My gut feeling is that compression is
> > better than hashing for that purpose,
> 
> It's analogous to a passphrase, have you ever heard of a
> passphrase being compressed rather than hashed? 
> 
> The only good reason for compression is if compression+hashing is
> faster than hashing, and that sounds unlikely.

Good to see someone have thoughts on this.
I've only seen it stated that entropy passes thru mostly "untouched" thru
a cryptographic hash in the literature.  I haven't seen anything mentioned
about entropy thru a compression algorithm other than as an estimation
of entropy.


> You all seem to be making very heavy weather of this - all that's needed
> is to pass the low-grade stuff through a hash of your choice and then
> follow that with the entropy file to fill-up the remaining 4k.

Or fill-up the 4k buffers with high-quality entropy, and add in the
low-grade stuff if there is room.

-- 
-- David  (obrien at FreeBSD.org)