EoL dates

[Colin Percival]

At 10:14 24/08/2003 -0700, I wrote:
>   Either I'm missing your point, or you're missing my point.  There are 
> five release branches now which are "not officially supported", but I 
> have yet to see any circumstance where they have, in fact, not been 
> supported.  If those branches were not being supported because people 
> were too busy to support them, I'd understand perfectly; but as far as I 
> can see, those branches *are* being supported.

   Oops.  As hawkeyd at visi.com has just pointed out to me, I didn't look far 
enough; SA-03:01, :02, :03, :05, and :06 didn't have official patches for 
the unsupported branches.

   I'll go sit quietly in the corner now.

Colin Percival