LSI2008 controller clobbers first disk with new LSI mps driver
Desai, Kashyap
Kashyap.Desai at lsi.com
Wed Feb 22 16:11:32 UTC 2012
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Douglas Gilbert [mailto:dgilbert at interlog.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 8:52 PM
> To: Desai, Kashyap
> Cc: Jason Wolfe; freebsd-scsi at freebsd.org; McConnell, Stephen
> Subject: Re: LSI2008 controller clobbers first disk with new LSI mps
> driver
>
> On 12-02-22 03:39 AM, Desai, Kashyap wrote:
> > Here is a possible root cause of this issue.
> >
> > Enclosure which you are using in your setup (might be) not configured
> properly.
> >
> > You have Enclosure with 12 Slots + 1 SES Device.
> > See below detail from the log.
> >
> > EventDataLength: 5
> > AckRequired: 0
> > Event: SasEnclDeviceStatusChange (0x1d)
> > EventContext: 0x0
> > EnclosureHandle: 0x2
> > ReasonCode: Added
> > PhysicalPort: 0
> > NumSlots: 13
> > StartSlot: 0
> > PhyBits: 0xff
> >
> > StartSlot is 0 in this case.
> > Correct behavior should be each device on your enclosure must have
> different slot number starting from 0 till 12.
> > I have doubt that SES device has not configured well and it is using
> slot-0 as default. This can create issue for actual device which is
> connected to slot-0.
> > So In your setup you will have slot-0 till slot-11 assigned for actual
> Phys of your enclosures and again slot-0 is assigned for SES device
> instead of Slot-12.
>
> No. SAS-2 expanders typically have an integral SES device on an
> expander _virtual_ phy (see SMP DISCOVER (LIST) response). Once
> you see that virtual phy flag the slot number is irrelevant.
Doug,
I need some more info so that I can understand your point better.
I have one Enclosure setup on FreeBSD. Here is smp_discover output. (smp_discover_list is failing for me)
phy 0: inaccessible (phy vacant)
phy 1: inaccessible (phy vacant)
phy 2: inaccessible (phy vacant)
phy 3: inaccessible (phy vacant)
phy 4:S:attached:[500605b012345888:03 i(SSP+STP+SMP)] 6 Gbps
phy 5:S:attached:[500605b012345888:02 i(SSP+STP+SMP)] 6 Gbps
phy 6:S:attached:[500605b012345888:01 i(SSP+STP+SMP)] 6 Gbps
phy 7:S:attached:[500605b012345888:00 i(SSP+STP+SMP)] 6 Gbps
phy 12:D:attached:[5000c5003bc2c389:00 t(SSP)] 6 Gbps
phy 13:D:attached:[500000e116ee91e2:00 t(SSP)] 6 Gbps
phy 14:D:attached:[5000c5003bc308e5:00 t(SSP)] 6 Gbps
phy 15:D:attached:[5000c5003bc2f0d1:00 t(SSP)] 6 Gbps
phy 16:D:attached:[5000c5003bc2ff3d:00 t(SSP)] 6 Gbps
phy 17:D:attached:[5000c5003bae5fdd:00 t(SSP)] 6 Gbps
phy 18:D:attached:[5000c5003bae5eb1:00 t(SSP)] 6 Gbps
phy 19:D:attached:[5000c5003bc2d135:00 t(SSP)] 6 Gbps
phy 20:D:attached:[5000c5003baea36d:00 t(SSP)] 6 Gbps
phy 21:D:attached:[5000c5003bc2a8c9:00 t(SSP)] 6 Gbps
phy 22:D:attached:[5000c5003bc237a9:00 t(SSP)] 6 Gbps
phy 23:D:attached:[5000c5003bc2cec1:00 t(SSP)] 6 Gbps
phy 24:D:attached:[500000e01d92cb52:00 t(SSP)] 3 Gbps
phy 25:D:attached:[500000e01d74cfb2:00 t(SSP)] 3 Gbps
phy 26:D:attached:[500000e01d656052:00 t(SSP)] 3 Gbps
phy 27:D:attached:[500000e01d7cad52:00 t(SSP)] 3 Gbps
phy 28:D:attached:[500c04f2b64cdd1c:00 t(SATA)] 3 Gbps
phy 29:D:attached:[500c04f2b64cdd1d:00 t(SATA)] 3 Gbps
phy 30:D:attached:[500000e01d73c262:00 t(SSP)] 3 Gbps
phy 31:D:attached:[500000e01d536b22:00 t(SSP)] 3 Gbps
phy 32:D:attached:[500000e01d92cab2:00 t(SSP)] 3 Gbps
phy 33:D:attached:[500000e01afd8792:00 t(SSP)] 3 Gbps
phy 34:D:attached:[5000c5003bc30301:00 t(SSP)] 6 Gbps
phy 35:D:attached:[5000c5003bb09a69:00 t(SSP)] 6 Gbps
phy 36:D:attached:[500c04f2b64cdd3d:00 V i(SSP) t(SSP)] 6 Gbps <--- This has virtual phy set.
What I understood from your explanation is if we have virt_phy field set, we should not trust slot for that entry.
You are suggesting to use phy index instead of slot. Just for info: But how to see Slot details mapping with phy ?
~ Kashyap
>
> Doug Gilbert
More information about the freebsd-scsi
mailing list