kern/134488: [mpt] MPT SCSI driver probes max. 8 LUNs per device
Michel Bouissou
mbouissou at bioimaging.com
Wed May 13 15:00:36 UTC 2009
The following reply was made to PR kern/134488; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Michel Bouissou <mbouissou at bioimaging.com>
To: Scott Long <scottl at samsco.org>
Cc: bug-followup at FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: kern/134488: [mpt] MPT SCSI driver probes max. 8 LUNs per
device
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 16:24:31 +0200
On mar, 2009-05-12 at 22:59 -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> Increasing the max_lun number in the code is not the solution. Which
> arbitrary number should be chosen? If it's increased to 32, what about
> those who want 64?
Well, 8 is as much arbitrary than 32 would be, but 32 would cover a
wider use spectrum.
SCSI disks enclosures holding 16 to 20 disks are quite commonplace, and
some show each disk as a LUN on the same SCSI device (i.e. some SCSI to
SATA enclosures, or some RAID bays with RAID turned off to use ZFS RAID
instead).
> What about the problems created for those with older
> hardware that can't handle high lun scanning?
I'm not sure whether this exists. Possibly. My own SCSI card BIOS
(LSILogic 1030 Ultra4 Adapter) only scans LUNs 0-7 when the system
boots, *but* that doesn't prevent FreeBSD to use much higher LUN numbers
when dev/mpt/mpt_cam.c is patched and recompiled for allowing so.
> The correct action requires a significant amount of code to be written
> and tested; if it were trivial it would have been done already.
Maybe guessing the highest LUN number to scan according to HW type would
be difficult, but would it be also very difficult to make this a
parameter that could default to 8 and be set to higher values with an
entry i.e. in /boot/loader.conf ?
Would be easier than having to recompile the kernel...
More information about the freebsd-scsi
mailing list