Tester wanted for multipath failover iSCSI target software

[Daisuke Aoyama]

Hi,

Thank you for reporting.

>I have tested "net/istgt" for couple of days with Windows XP and it
>works more reliable than NetBSD "net/iscsi-target".
>With NetBSD implementation sometimes I lost partition filesystem
>information after disconnecting server from network or rebooting my
>computer.

Yes, it is one of differences.
istgt reports connected information such as SCSI port to the initiator
for discriminating multipath and failover path.
As a side effect, perhaps more accurate identification is possible.

>Is there any particular testcases you want to perform?
If you use it as usual, it is tested enough.
If I had to say, I want to know how much a CPU usage on the target machine.
Because istgt is more complicated than iscsi-target.

>Tested on FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE #0: Wed Mar 11 22:29:33 EET 2009
Did you use the target with ZFS? or UFS?
Did you use MCS feature?

Thanks,
--
Daisuke Aoyama