CAM, SCSIn/iSCSI & LUNs
Danny Braniss
danny at cs.huji.ac.il
Tue Aug 9 13:47:25 GMT 2005
> Danny Braniss wrote:
> > hi,
> > it seems that one of the differences between the SCSI1/2/3/4/i
> > is the size of the LUN :-)
> >
> > Now, it seems that the CAM will search sequencially for LUNs, from 0 -> max_lun
> > which i don't think will scale nicely.
> >
> > is there a way to tell the cam to do a scsi report luns command, instead of
> > the sequential search?
> >
> > danny
> >
> >
>
> I, Matt Jacob, and Ken Merry talked about implementing REPORT_LUNS a
> couple of months ago, but it stalled for a reason that I cannot recall.
>
> Scott
i was wondering, it would be nice, if setting in XPT_PATH_INQ response
cpi->max_lun = -1, which would trigger the REPORT_LUNS ...
next question:
when a target/unit is lost it seems that the luns > 0 have to be
removed/cleared by the sim, shouldn't it be done by the CAM?
danny
More information about the freebsd-scsi
mailing list