adaptec 2940u/uw dump card state ends
Jesse Guardiani
jesse at wingnet.net
Fri Jan 23 08:45:00 PST 2004
Don Lewis wrote:
> On 22 Jan, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
>> Jesse Guardiani wrote:
[...]
>>> (ch0:ahc0:0:2:1): SCB 0xe - timed out
>
> Just a guess ... maybe the changer mechanism requires a longer time than
> what the driver thinks. At the top of /usr/src/sys/cam/scsi/scsi_ch.c
> there is the following:
>
> /*
> * Timeout definitions for various changer related commands. They may
> * be too short for some devices (especially the timeout for INITIALIZE
> * ELEMENT STATUS).
> */
>
> static const u_int32_t CH_TIMEOUT_MODE_SENSE = 6000;
> static const u_int32_t CH_TIMEOUT_MOVE_MEDIUM = 100000;
> static const u_int32_t CH_TIMEOUT_EXCHANGE_MEDIUM = 100000;
> static const u_int32_t CH_TIMEOUT_POSITION_TO_ELEMENT = 100000;
> static const u_int32_t CH_TIMEOUT_READ_ELEMENT_STATUS = 10000;
> static const u_int32_t CH_TIMEOUT_SEND_VOLTAG = 10000;
> static const u_int32_t CH_TIMEOUT_INITIALIZE_ELEMENT_STATUS = 500000;
>
> I think these times are milliseconds. The scsi command that you are
> using may be using one of these timeouts: CH_TIMEOUT_MOVE_MEDIUM,
> CH_TIMEOUT_EXCHANGE_MEDIUM, or CH_TIMEOUT_POSITION_TO_ELEMENT (I'm not
> very familiar with changers). These appear to be set to 100 seconds, so
> if your changer takes longer than this, the driver will time out the
> command before the changer indicates that it is finished. Try bumping
> these up and rebuild your kernel. They should probably be tunable ...
Hmmm...
The device works absolutely perfectly after that first timeout. Do you still
think it's a timeout issue? Personally, I'm leaning toward it being a problem
with termination because I _believe_ this autoloader is an 8 bit device.
Unfortunately, I don't understand the problem, so I don't really know how to
fix it. :( Maybe some googling will help.
>>> So far, all further commands have been successfull.
>>>
>>> Here's my uname:
>>>
>>> # uname -a
>>> FreeBSD billmax.int.wingnet.net 4.9-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE #0: Sun
>>> Jan 18 18:29:28 EST 2004
>>> jesse at billmax.int.wingnet.net:/usr/src/sys/compile/BILLMAX i386
>>>
>>> Any suggestions?
>>
>> Surely someone on the -SCSI list can at LEAST answer my simple questions
>> about TERM PWR vs SCSI TERM jumpers on drives....
>>
>> I'd love to know why I'm getting the above timeout too, but if someone
>> could just verify the difference between TERM PWR and SCSI TERM, and
>> how they should be used then I can at least get a starting point.
>
> One of the wires the SCSI bus (TERMPWR) is used to supply termination
> power to any passive terminators (or active terminators without their
> own power source) at the ends of the bus. Usually you will want the
> host adapter to supply termination power. Peripherals also commonly
> have jumpers or switches that can be set to cause them to supply power
> to the TERMPWR line. If the peripheral has a jumper labeled TERM PWR,
> it is used to supply power to the TERMPWR line on the SCSI bus. As I
> recall, no more than two devices should power the TERMPWR line, to limit
> the amount of current that would flow if the TERMPWR line is shorted to
> ground, so that nothing catches on fire.
>
> Many peripherals are also able to terminate the bus so that an external
> terminator is not needed. This is typically done by setting a jumper or
> switch, or plugging a resistor pack into a socket on the peripheral. If
> the peripheral at the end of a bus is used to terminate the bus instead
> of using an external terminator, the power for the terminator can either
> be taken from the power supplied to the peripheral, or from the TERM PWR
> line on the SCSI bus. You would want to do the latter if you want the
> bus to operate properly even if power to the peripheral is shut off.
>
> I typically use Seagate SCSI disks which have two jumper positions to
> control termination and termination power. I believe there are five
> different jumper arrangements allowed (at least for single-ended SCSI)
> for the different termination configurations.
>
> When the host adapter is at one end of the bus, I prefer to let it feed
> TERMPWR along with the peripheral at the other end of the bus (assuming
> that it is always powered on), so that the power to the terminator at
> the far end of the bus is as clean as possible.
Great explanation! Thanks!
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f)
http://www.wingnet.net
More information about the freebsd-scsi
mailing list