Ruby 1.9.2

[Philip M. Gollucci]

On 9/6/2010 6:31 AM, Alexander Logvinov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> 2010/9/6 Aristedes Maniatis<ari at ish.com.au>:
>> So effectively you just removed all the patches from the port directory,
>> changed the version and built?
>   You also should worry about plist changes.
>
>> Are there a set of functionality tests
>> somewhere we can run (other than "does it break anything"?)
>   I don't know. Exp-run? Anyway Ruby 1.9.2 is mostly compatible with
> 1.9.1 according ruby-lang.org site and 1.9 version is not a default
> Ruby for FreeBSD. :)
>

No, rails3 doesn't work with 1.9.1 it sigsevs runtime. Dont' try. I 
would have if'ed it, but we don't have the logic in place in bsd.ruby.mk 
to make writing that conditional easy. 1.8.7 > && < 1.9.0|| >= 1.9.2

Which is why my commit message pointed that out.

No, ruby 1.2.9 does need some patches.  Also, it doesn't seem to self 
test completely.

Stas@ is working on this.


-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70  3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C
Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci at p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354
VP Apache Infrastructure; Member, Apache Software Foundation
Committer,                        FreeBSD Foundation


Consultant,                       P6M7G8 Inc.
Sr. System Admin,                 Ridecharge Inc.

Work like you don't need the money,
love like you'll never get hurt,
and dance like nobody's watching.