[RFC]: RUBYGEM_AUTOPLIST implied by USE_RUBYGEMS=yes

[Philip M. Gollucci]

> I don't think it is a good idead as historically we prefer static pkg-plists
> over dynamic ones. For ports where names of the files are perfectly known
> AUTOPLIST feature is not required. When I introduced this option my intention
> was to work around rdoc names generation problem and to not eliminate rubygem
> pkg-plists entirely.
*sigh*.

Wouldn't every rubygem port have to use it to work around that issue 
(the zfs one?)?

That means every rubygem should fail in QAT then b/c of the NOPORTDOCS
.... he must be excluding them.