Should etc/rc.d/ike move to ports?

[Ion-Mihai Tetcu]

On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:39:27 -0800
Doug Barton <dougb at FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> 
> > Better use:
> > USE_RC_SUBR=	ike
> > and put the script in files/ike.in
> > 
> > Currently this will perform some substitutions on the script
> > (PREFEIX, etc.) and install it as ike.sh
> 
> Thanks for that, I wasn't aware that a .in vs. .sh.in was already
> working :)

Now:
USE_RC_SUBR= name.sh.in --> name.sh
USE_RC_SUBR= name.in --> name.sh
Then:
USE_RC_SUBR= name.sh.in --> name.sh
USE_RC_SUBR= name.in --> name

Is this not what we want ?


-- 
IOnut - Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"

Party-bug in the Aloha protocol