Should etc/rc.d/ike move to ports?

[Simon L. Nielsen]

On 2005.12.16 14:13:34 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:

> Because it was previously not possible to run scripts for ports in the base 
> rcorder, and because the rc.d/ike script needed to run well before 
> localpkg, it was imported into the base, and lives currently in /etc/rc.d. 
> However, now that I am about to MFC the code that runs ports scripts in the 
> base rcorder, I'm wondering if we shouldn't add the rc.d script to the 
> port, and remove it from HEAD and RELENG_6 after my MFC. I would of course 
> be glad to assist with any details related to the move.

Hey,

Sound like a good idea.  I actually hadn't noticed that the ike script
had been updated to point at isakmpd, last I checked it looked like
the ike script was just a leftover from the NetBSD import.

I also thought I had committed the isakmpd rc.d script that I did for
$REALJOB a while ago (based on the rc.d/ike script) to the port, but
it looks like I forgot to do that.

I will try to get the port updated to include an rc.d script this
weekend, but no guarantees that I will get to it - Christmas is coming
way to fast with all the required shopping ;-).

With regard to the magic keywords (mainly REQUIRE/DEBFORE) I assume
the ones currently in src/etc/rc.d/ike should be OK?

-- 
Simon L. Nielsen
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-rc/attachments/20051217/e71d3fd4/attachment.bin