Invalid DKIM signatures in this list

[Victor Sudakov]

John R. Levine wrote:
>> The problem is: The signature was not broken until FreeBSD's list manager
>> touched the body.
>
>Yes, we all know that.  We knew that a decade ago when we wrote the DKIM
>specs.  That is not news.

Do you mean nobody cares? RFC6377 is dated September 2011, for all 
these years nobody has tried to do something about FreeBSD's MLM breaking 
signatures?

OK, fine.

>
>> PS I recommend RFC6377 for reading. I learnt much from it.
>
>Indeed, but I wouldn't take everything it says too seriously.

But a fix to the MLM should be pretty trivial too? For the present, 
it's annoying to see ugly "red padlocks" near some messages in the 
MUA. Even no padlock at all would look better.

-- 
Victor Sudakov,  VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
2:5005/49 at fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/