sh[it] and What am I missing here?

[Baho Utot]

On 06/05/16 23:34, Jon Radel wrote:
>>> It does need the suffix .sh because if it is missing I fail to
>>> function...... the computer does just fine.
>> No, if this is the case you are doing something weird. The filename does
>> not matter, and the extension is just part of that filename.
>>
>>
> Perhaps you should read what he wrote again?  He's already agreed that FreeBSD doesn't need the extension.  It's more a personal problem--I can only surmise he confuses himself less when he labels his files with hints as to their type.
>
> :-/
>
> --Jon Radel

Yep you got it....When I see .sh I know it's a shell script