Build Ports Without X11?
dweimer
dweimer at dweimer.net
Tue Jul 29 19:26:25 UTC 2014
On 07/29/2014 2:04 pm, Rick Miller wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am using Poudriere to bulk build packages and encountered a failure
> that
> resulted in the program skipping a couple ports. The failure occurred
> due
> to an X11 error. However, the expectation is that all ports would
> build
> without X11 thus negating the need to compile and build all the X11
> dependancies for various packages.
>
> Despite the make.conf (shown below) specifying WITHOUT_X11, all these
> ports
> built with X11 support anyway.
>
> I'm pretty sure I must be doing something wrong and hoping that someone
> might be able to lead me to the solution that will compile any port
> without
> X11 support.
>
> Packages failed/skipped:
>
> gtk-update-icon-cache-2.24.22: failed
> gtk2-2.24.22_3: skipped due to above failure
> vim-7.4.364: skipped due to above failure
>
> make.conf:
>
> # cat 10_0-amd64-make.conf
> WITH_PKGNG=YES
> PERL_VERSION=5.16.3
> WITHOUT_X11=YES
I believe it should be:
OPTIONS_UNSET="X11" on newer systems.
However, it appears to not be pulling in the X11 option, but rather the
GTK2 option.
perhaps adding OPTIONS_UNSET="GTK2" would work, or just simply use the
vim-lite port instead of vim, I do this on all my servers (of course
none are running a GUI), though I haven't read through the Makefiles to
be sure what else beyond GUI components isn't included in the lite port
versus the full port, there's a chance it may drop off something else
you are wanting.
--
Thanks,
Dean E. Weimer
http://www.dweimer.net/
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list