NFS Performance: Weirder And Weirder
Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
m.e.sanliturk at gmail.com
Sun Mar 17 04:56:11 UTC 2013
There is one more point to check :
>From your mount information , in the server , directories are on DIFFERENT
drives .
Assume one of the drives is very "INTELLIGENT" to save power .
During local reading , due to reading speed , it may not go to "SLEEP" ,
but during network access , it may go to sleep due to its exceeded waiting
time .
If this is the case , please stay away from INTELLIGENT drives in a server
: These are designed and produced by very IGNORANT entities .
For simple , personal applications , their latency may not be noticed very
much , but in a server , they can not be used .
Another point may be file sizes .
To check effect of file size , into the two different directories copy a
large ( for example , 5 GB , or a 4.n GB .iso file ) and
transmit these same files from their directories to a single client .
If directory structure makes a difference , assuming hardware parts and
client does not behave differently to these files ,
performance difference may be attributed to server side .
Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list