Jail with public IP alias
Patrick
gibblertron at gmail.com
Thu Aug 29 21:07:20 UTC 2013
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Alejandro Imass <aimass at yabarana.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Frank Leonhardt <frank2 at fjl.co.uk> wrote:
>> On 29/08/2013 09:52, Frank Leonhardt wrote:
>>>
>
> Hi Frank thanks for taking the time to try to replicate this. Here is
> all the detailed info
>
> 8.1-RELEASE
>
> em0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
> options=209b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,WOL_MAGIC>
> ether 00:31:88:bd:b9:3a
> inet xxx.yyy.52.74 netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast xxx.yyy.52.127
> inet xxx.yyy.52.70 netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast xxx.yyy.52.127
> inet xxx.yyy.52.71 netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast xxx.yyy.52.127
> inet xxx.yyy.52.73 netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast xxx.yyy.52.127
> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
> status: active
>
> I use rc.conf standard practice for aliases:
>
> ifconfig_em0="inet xxx.yyy.52.74 netmask 255.255.255.128 -tso"
> ifconfig_em0_alias0="inet xxx.yyy.52.70 netmask 255.255.255.128 -tso"
> ifconfig_em0_alias1="inet xxx.yyy.52.71 netmask 255.255.255.128 -tso"
> ifconfig_em0_alias2="inet xxx.yyy.52.73 netmask 255.255.255.128 -tso"
>
> nune# netstat -rn
> Routing tables
>
> Internet:
> Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire
> default xxx.yyy.52.1 UGS 168 182183463 em0
> 127.0.0.1 link#4 UH 0 0 lo0
> [... internal aliases to lo0 here...]
> xxx.yyy.52.0/25 link#1 U 0 68581 em0
> xxx.yyy.52.70 link#1 UHS 0 14363 lo0
> xxx.yyy.52.71 link#1 UHS 0 64765 lo0
> xxx.yyy.52.73 link#1 UHS 0 0 lo0
> xxx.yyy.52.74 link#1 UHS 0 29170 lo0
>
> Note the Netif Expire on 71,73,74 are showing lo0 could this be the problem?
>
> nune# ssh -b xxx.yyy.52.71 foo at bar
> Password:
>
>> w -n
> 3:15PM up 130 days, 22:30, 3 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.02, 0.00
> USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT
> [...]
> foo pts/24 xxx.yyy.52.74 3:14PM - w -n
>
> I don't know why mine is showing 74 and from your example it should be
> showing 71. Did you see the article below?
>
> http://serverfault.com/questions/12285/when-ip-aliasing-how-does-the-os-determine-which-ip-address-will-be-used-as-sour
>
> This seems to be a pretty common issue or it's just a
> miss-configuration problem?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Alejandro Imass
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
Aliases should have a netmask of 255.255.255.255. What you seeing is
not typical behaviour on FreeBSD.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/configtuning-virtual-hosts.html
Patrick
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list