Why Clang

[Wojciech Puchar]

>>> but not to be turned into closed source products.
>>
>> What a lying sonofabitch. That is not called freedom. That is called
>> "forcible, viral open source". I think we can all see the difference. Open
>> your motherfucking eyes, communist goofball...
>
> Give him a break.  His heart is in the right place, though his choice of

GNU licence is nothing about freedom, it just says it is freedom.

But what really is important for FreeBSD is if it can be used. IMHO 
nothing from GPLv3 prevents it, and it is no licence based reasons to use 
clang.