A quality operating system

[Chip Camden]

Quoth Evan Busch on Saturday, 27 August 2011:
> 
> > In most cases, documentation requires you to have a minimal
> > clue of what you're doing. There's terminology you simply
> > have to know, and concepts to understand in order to use
> > the documentation.
> 
> See the Wikipedia page above -- the problem isn't one of user
> competence, but of poorly-written documentation that is fundamentally
> disorganized.
> 
> Have you looked at any of the documentation coming out of Redmond right now?
> 
> How do you think FreeBSD's documentation stands up to that?
> 

Oh please.  I have to use that crap that comes out of Redmond on a daily
basis.  They never think things through and only answer the most shallow
questions, and their "How to"s make their little "Was this helpful?" seem
sarcastic.

-- 
.O. | Sterling (Chip) Camden      | http://camdensoftware.com
..O | sterling at camdensoftware.com | http://chipsquips.com
OOO | 2048R/D6DBAF91              | http://chipstips.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20110827/8ef29462/attachment.pgp