Filesystem of choice for a Linux/FreeBSD shared backup disk?
andrew clarke
mail at ozzmosis.com
Tue Sep 23 20:19:11 UTC 2008
On Tue 2008-09-23 17:17:21 UTC+0200, Andreas Davour (ante at Update.UU.SE) wrote:
> I've bought a usb connected disk to use as backup, and I've been
> thinking about trying to make the data as available as possible. Do
> anyone here have any suggestion about what kind of filesystem would be
> best to use? Can ufs2 be read by linux? It looks like it from my short
> persual of google hits, but it also looks kind of complicated. IS ext2 a
> safer bet? Anything totally different?
>
> Any filesystem that can handle data from both BSD and Linux without too
> much metadata mangling would do.
I'm not sure about UFS support in Linux. You would probably need to
ask on a Linux list. The man page for newfs says that you can create
UFS1 filesystems with it, which may help with compatibility?
mount_ext2fs is available in FreeBSD but I can't speak for its
reliability.
There is full read/write support for NTFS provided by
sysutils/fusefs-ntfs in the Ports tree. I suspect there are some
limitations though, eg. tighter restrictions than UFS on what
characters are permitted in filenames.
For making backups I would probably just use FAT32 and tar, because
practically anything (not just FreeBSD & Linux) will mount FAT32 file
systems, and tar should respect your file attributes (owner, group,
creation timestamp, last modified timestamp, etc).
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list