Google Chrome

[Gerard]

On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 19:03:51 +0100
RW <fbsd06 at mlists.homeunix.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 09:39:01 -0500
> David Kelly <dkelly at hiwaay.net> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 03:13:35PM +0100, RW wrote:  
> > > 
> > > For most people that's already happened, except that it's
> > > Adobe-Flash WWW. Google's approach of open-source software, and
> > > open-extensions, leading to new standards, sounds a lot better to
> > > me.  
> > 
> > What about this?
> > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/09/03/google_chrome_eula_sucks/  
> 
> 
> That's for the binary. AFAIK the source is BSD licensed, with
> some third-party components under other open-source licences. 

Well, it did not take Google long to get on noticed:

http://www.us-cert.gov/current/index.html#google_chrome_vulnerability

I think I will pass on the whole Google 'browser' concept.

-- 
Gerard
gerard at seibercom.net

All is well that ends well.

	John Heywood
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20080903/133a389f/signature.pgp