arplookup 0.0.0.0 failed: host is not on local network
Christer Solskogen
solskogen at carebears.mine.nu
Wed May 14 11:22:50 UTC 2008
Derek Ragona wrote:
> Yes aliases should have a netmask of 255.255.255.255
>
>
Still no go.
192.168.0.255 is showing up in "arp -a" and netstat -rn. (and the
"arplookup 0.0.0.0 failed: host is not on local network" in
/var/log/messages)
nfe0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
options=18b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4>
ether 00:18:f3:29:d8:15
inet 192.168.0.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
inet 192.168.0.4 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 192.168.0.4
inet 192.168.0.5 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 192.168.0.5
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX <full-duplex,flag0,flag1>)
status: active
Anything else that might explain this kind of behavior?
--
chs
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list