[HOW-TO] cvsup for ports -- Re: compact portsnap db

[Gerard]

On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 15:41:35 -0500
"Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:

[snip]

> 1. Csup is in the base system thus obvious preferred to either cvsup
> or portsnap

Correct me if I am wrong; however, I thought that 'portsnap' was part
of the base system.

-- 

Gerard
gerard at seibercom.net

I cannot conceive that anybody will require multiplications at the rate
of 40,000 or even 4,000 per hour ...

	F. H. Wales (1936)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20080106/9165dc9c/signature.pgp