Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

[Jerry]

On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:28:00 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar <wojtek at wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:

>in bells and whistles windows is best. for those who require it paying
>a bit for windows is not a problem.
>
>Those who need to do actual work, we have FreeBSD for example

Define: 'Actual Work'? What you are referring to is that it meets your
criteria. Everyone's work platform might not be so narrow.

I use FreeBSD for may things; however, it is by no means a perfect
system. There are just too many things that either don't work, or don't
work well. As we are migrating to 64-bit systems here, I can see
FreeBSD playing an even smaller part in our corporate picture.

-- 
Jerry
gesbbb at yahoo.com

Usually, when a lot of men get together, it's called a war.

	Mel Brooks, "The Listener"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20081211/fac47273/signature.pgp