Firewalls
Bruce Cran
bruce at cran.org.uk
Mon Apr 28 19:50:12 UTC 2008
Doug Hardie wrote:
> FreeBSD supports 3 firewalls: IPF, IPFW, and PF. Some time ago
> (perhaps years) I seem to recall some discussion that one or more of
> those was better maintained and higher quality than the others. I don't
> see any indications of this in the handbook. Several years ago I needed
> to do traffic shaping and used IPFW with dummynet. It worked but the
> need eventually went away. More recently I needed to incorporate spamd
> which defaults to PF so I used that. However, now I am back to needing
> traffic shaping again. I suspect trying to use both PF and IPFW
> simultaneously will not be a good approach. In addition, there now are
> instructions for using spamd with IPFW so it appears that either PF or
> IPFW will do what I need. Is there any additional information available
> to assist in selecting between those? Thanks.
As I understand it pf is often found to be easiest to use and has lots
of features like altq and os fingerprinting but is quite a bit slower
than ipfw.
--
Bruce
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list