per-interface default routes?

dex djdexter at gmail.com
Thu Mar 15 19:43:35 UTC 2007


On 3/14/07, Alexandre Biancalana <biancalana at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/14/07, Wojciech Puchar <wojtek at tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:
> > yes. but ipfw is most universal having all needed things at one place.
> > firewalling, routing, shaping, etc.
>
> PF too. is all at same place.

And pf has nat built-in, so it runs in kernel space.


More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list