FreeBSD Installer vs RedHat Linux Fedora Core Installer?

Sunnz sunnzy at gmail.com
Thu Jan 4 00:02:15 PST 2007


2007/1/4, Garrett Cooper <youshi10 at u.washington.edu>:
> That's changing. MS is abandoning the 2000 installer and going strictly
> GUI, come Vista.
> - -Garrett

Well, that's not too surprising - they already have that Aero thing,
so they just as well do a fancy installer. But having a fancy GUI
installer shouldn't be considered as "Microsofty", as they haven't
done it yet... whereas Red Hat and even Apple have done it for a long
time.

For a simple desktop end user like me, who just devote the whole hard
disk for FreeBSD, I think the installer now is adequate.

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFFnKqNEnKyINQw/HARAsLPAJwOovkeM5f9V0qt0SLhEosRZwQw+QCfSvGc
> ++zZXqfxjr2GNmBHMxn8r0E=
> =fJD1
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>


-- 
sunnz.net - sunnz.com - sunnz.org


More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list