Apparently, csh programming is considered harmful.

Ted Mittelstaedt tedm at toybox.placo.com
Thu Dec 13 21:30:33 PST 2007



> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-freebsd-questions at freebsd.org
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions at freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Mike Jeays
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 5:13 PM
> To: FreeBSD Questions
> Subject: Re: Apparently, csh programming is considered harmful.
>

>
> <flamebait>Bash has all the features one is likely to need for
> interactive use
> as well, and one could make a good case for it being the 'standard' shell
> now.</flamebait>
>
>

The "standard" shell MUST be able to be statically compiled.

You don't have access to all your nice dynamically loaded libraries
when the only filesystem on your server that will mount is /, due
to some disk error.

Ted
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.1/1183 - Release Date: 12/13/2007
9:15 AM



More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list