Convince me, please!
Chad Perrin
perrin at apotheon.com
Thu Aug 9 14:34:03 PDT 2007
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 12:30:32PM -0500, David Kelly wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 06:54:37PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >
> > >For the best user experience, and Unix too: MacOS X.
> >
> > a very little unix (few tools and kernel) + lots of bulky overhead ...
>
> Try it, you will find otherwise. The user interface works without
> hassle. MacOS X comes with more standard utilities than does FreeBSD,
> for instance procmail, fetchmail, sqlite3, Apache, php 4.4.7, ...
I don't really think of entirely unnecessary (for most purposes) server
software as "standard utilities". Speaking only for myself, I *have*
tried MacOS X (and used it in a professional capacity), and I too find it
to be "very little unix" with "lots of bulky overhead". I also find it
actively user-hostile in some of its aesthetic design choices (when your
aesthetic sense demands that you make input devices less usable, there's
a problem).
MacOS X has some definite benefits, but it's not the be-all and end-all
of OS design by any stretch. Its biggest benefit is that it's not MS
Windows (speaking of user hostility).
--
CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ]
print substr("Just another Perl hacker", 0, -2);
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list