Bizzare routing table entry.

[jdow]

From: "Josh Carroll" <josh.carroll at gmail.com>

>> root# route delete 0&0xc0a80132
>>
>>   [1] 37343
>>   route: writing to routing socket: No such process
>>   delete net 0: not in table
>>   0xc0a80132: Command not found.
>>   [1]  + Exit 1                        route delete 0
> 
>> root# route delete 0&0xc0a80132
>>
>>   [1] 37343
>>   route: writing to routing socket: No such process
>>   delete net 0: not in table
>>   0xc0a80132: Command not found.
>>   [1]  + Exit 1                        route delete 0
> 
> I've no idea whether that is a valid route or not, but the reason
> you're getting that funkiness is that the shell is eating the & and
> thinks you are sending the route process to the background. Try:
> 
> route delete '0&0xc0a80132'

There goes 192.168.1.50.

{^_-}    Joanne