FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD

[perikillo]

On 11/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin <infofarmer at freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> On 11/26/06, John Smith <almarrie at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 11/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin <infofarmer at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > > On 11/26/06, John Smith <almarrie at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE?
> > >
> > > The general consensus is you should not touch ULE unless
> > > you're a developer willing to fix some outstanding issues and
> > > maybe take active maintainership of it.
> > >
> > > You can try it just for the fun of it, but your problem reports
> > > will be met by a grinning "we told you so".
> > >
> >
> > Thank you Andrew,
> >
> > I'm asking because I downloaded PC-BSD 1.3 Beta which is based on
> > FreeBSD 6.1 and the default in kernel is ULE, so I wanted to make
> > sure.
>
> That's strange. I've used ULE for months on many boxes, but
> much as I like it, I have to admit there are serious problems
> with it. There are different reports, but it's clear you can't use
> it in production environments. It might be okay to run it on your
> {desk,lap}top system, though, but PC-BSD developers have
> yet to comment on their reasoning.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>

  I recommende not to use the ULE for production, months ago, my backup
server start crashing, until someone told me to disable ULE_ and enable the
old 4BSD scheduler, check
this posts:


http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2006-October/132966.html

   My system back to normal after i disable ULE.

   Greetings.