Obsolete packages
Kris Kennaway
kris at obsecurity.org
Mon Apr 24 22:27:28 UTC 2006
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 01:41:51PM -0500, Eric Schuele wrote:
> Lena at lena.kiev.ua wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >A new version of a port (www/firefox) was released on April 14.
> >
> ># portversion -v firefox
> >firefox-1.5.0.1,1 < needs updating (port has 1.5.0.2,1)
> >
> >But packages still (on April 24) are of previous version:
> >
> >$ ftp ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/
> >ftp> dir packages-5-stable/All/firefox-1*
> >-rw-r--r-- 1 110 0 11188636 Apr 01 16:29
> >firefox-1.5.0.1_2,1.tbz
> >ftp> dir packages-6-stable/All/firefox-1*
> >-rw-r--r-- 1 110 0 11511879 Apr 02 10:21
> >firefox-1.5.0.1_2,1.tbz
> >ftp> dir packages-7-current/All/firefox-1*
> >-rw-r--r-- 1 110 0 11511428 Apr 03 04:40
> >firefox-1.5.0.1_2,1.tbz
> >
> >Is something broken or is there insufficient computing power for
> >building new packages more often?
>
> It's my understanding that packages are built "when possible". They
> often lag that which is in ports. There are only so many cycles in a
> day (per cpu and per person). I would assume that there is some logical
> order in which the packages are built (most used first? Though not sure
> how that would be determined)
I continuously rebuild packages using a method that only builds
"changed" packages (new, updated to new version or with a dependency
that was changed). This typically gives a turnaround time on i386 of
less than a day to several days for packages becoming available, but
as I said in another reply I'm not uploading them now because of the
looming release cycle.
Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20060424/c3755fad/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list