a question about the pkg_add and "make install clean"
well sun
sunwell at hotmail.com
Mon Mar 28 19:27:23 PST 2005
thanks your answers. I use the ports-supfile and stable-supfile under
/usr/share/examples/cvsup to do upgrade.
I think I understand what the difference between the pkg_add and "make
install".
That is if I want to install the latest version, I should use the
"make install" or get the xxx.tbz from the freebsd-current directory.
Is it correct?
Could I make the default directory from 5.3-release to 6.0-current by
change one configuration file? If I want to override the default
fetching site of "pkg_add" command by some faster sites, how can I do?
>From: Chris <racerx at makeworld.com>
>Reply-To: racerx at makeworld.com
>To: Abu Khaled <khaled.abu at gmail.com>
>CC: well sun <sunwell at hotmail.com>, freebsd-questions at freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: a question about the pkg_add and "make install clean"
>Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:38:56 -0600
>
>Abu Khaled wrote:
>>On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 01:12:10 +0000, well sun <sunwell at hotmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>> I had install the freebsd5.3 with custom setup and only
>>>install
>>> the source code and base, not install xorg and perl. Then I use
>>>cvsup
>>> to upgrade stable source code and current ports. After doing
>>>these, I
>>> want to install the kde3 and gnome2. But I found when I use the
>>> pkg_add command, freebsd will go to the directory under
>>>"5.3-release",
>>> it is older than the installation using "make install clean"
>>>command.
>>> For example, when I use pkg_add xorg, it will install 6.7
>>>version.
>>> When I use "make install clean", it will install 6.8.2 version.
>>>How
>>> can I make them to install same versions? Another question is,
>>>when I
>>> install the xorg-clients, it give me a error message that
>>>"libc.so.6"
>>> not found, and many reference to *GL.so not found, how can I
>>>fix it? I
>>> had get the latest X11R7-src{1,2,3}.tar.bz2.
>>>
>>
>>
>>My guess would be that you did not build/install world/kernel. So
>>the
>>package system still defaults to your 5.3 release branch. The
>>sources/ports you updated must be for the development brach
>>FreeBSD-5.X, also known as FreeBSD 5-STABLE "RELENG 5"
>>
>>Check your CVSUP configuration (supfile).
>>if default tag=RELENG_5 then you are tracking 5.4 STABLE and you
>>need
>>to buildworld/kernel and install (check the handbook).
>>
>>If you don't whant to buildworld/kernel then change "tag=RELENG_5"
>>to
>>"tag=RELENG_5_3", cvsup again and your sources/ports well be the
>>same
>>as PACKAGES (the older ones)
>>
>
>This is flat out wrong. The cvsup of the src tree and the ports tree
>are seperate. You would use 2 seperate cvs files.
>
>Now, you "could" combine them I suppose (I dont know out right - I
>have not done this. If you cvsup the ports tree (and it sounds like
>you may have, by doing so, you have pulled in a "newer" tree of the
>ports. Thus, a make install would get you the newest installs
>(pending on when you cvsuped the ports tree) of those programs.
>
>Using pkg_add is simply going out to the FBSD site and installing
>the binary (pre compiled) versions that were released when the OS
>was released.
>
>The proper tag for getting the latest ports tree under 5.3-RELEASE
>would be this in the ports-supfile:
>
>*default release=cvs tag=.
>
>Remeber, as long as you keep your ports tree up to date, the
>packages will always be outdated.
>
>You can find all this out by simply reading the handbook online.
>
>Please try to know what your talking about before confusing a
>newbie.
>
>--
>Best regards,
>Chris
>
>Virtue is its own punishment.
_________________________________________________________________
[1]Find files on your PC instantly with the new MSN Toolbar Suite beta
FREE!
References
1. http://g.msn.com/8HMBENUS/2737??PS=47575
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list