Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question

[Jay O'Brien]

Michael C. Shultz wrote:

 > It would be nice if the ports make options were better documented, but 
> you can read through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk and find information
> on the various options. 
> 
> here is an example:
> 
> # all-depends-list
> #                         - Show all directories which are dependencies
> #                                 for this port.
> 
> then
> 
> cd /usr/ports/lang/ezm3/
> make all-depends-list
> 
> result:
> 
> /usr/ports/converters/libiconv
> /usr/ports/devel/gettext
> /usr/ports/devel/gmake
> /usr/ports/devel/libtool15
> 
> -Mike
>

Mike, 

That's great info, thank you. It really helps put this into perspective.

I did portmanager -sl and it identifies 7 candidates for deletion. 
It identifies cvsup-without-gui and also identifies ezm3 upon which 
it depends. Am I missing something here or shouldn't ezm3 not been 
identified as a "leaf port"?

Jay