Thank you!

[Freebsd0101 at aol.com]

In a message dated 1/14/05 1:07:20 PM Eastern Standard Time, zettel at acm.org 
writes:
>> still-under-development 5.x. Which seems counterproductive for an O/S
>> that is trying to establish itself as a choice as a server platform.
>
>Not necessarily. The interesting question hasn't been addressed yet.
>Is 5.3 on its fastest supported chipset faster or slower than 4.10 on
>its fastest supported chipset?
----
Thats a sad commentary, if the "new" version of FreeBSD is 5% faster on 
a hardware platform that should be 30% faster. Is that the goal you seek?

so you have to pay 50% more to get the same performance on 5.3. Thats
quite a selling point!