CA-cert

[Stijn Hoop]

Offtopic, but...

On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 09:22:48PM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> > Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> > > Pointless for us, as CAcert's root certificate isn't included in
> > > I.E., so the end users have to go through the same honky-tonk to
> > > include it in their browsers as if you just make your own certs.
> >
> > Not quite. If they include the CA-Cert root certificate, they only have
> > to do that once for all of your CA-Cert signed certificates.
> 
> Good point.

Not only that, but the more people using CA-Cert, the easier it will become
to convince browsers to include the CA-Cert root certificate by default.

--Stijn

-- 
Tact, n.:
	The unsaid part of what you're thinking.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20050110/f1e8f12b/attachment.bin