Managing bad sectors during install

[Kris Kennaway]

On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 11:09:12PM +0100, P?sztor Rich?rd wrote:
> I think this 8,4 quantum is old enough to not contain so called "spare 
> sectors". So 1 bad sector means there is really only 1 bad
> sector. Anyway i still cant understand, why UFS cant cope with bad blocks, 
> but 1000 year old FAT, or the newer NTFS
> can easyli get through the  problem.

There didn't seem to be a question there.

> The other problem: how should i mount "/" read-only, because i always get 
> "busy" error-message?

When you do what, exactly?

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20050217/1b7aed27/attachment.bin