GTK vs QT

[Tabor Kelly]

Gert Cuykens wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 03:39:05 +0000, Mick Walker <mwalker at codegurus.org> wrote:
> 
>>Why would you make a statement like that without making points to back
>>it up?
> 
> 
> because i dont have points except that qt can kiss my $$$ :)
> 
> no i am just wondering what you guy's think thats all i lookt around
> on the internet a bit but that was old stuff about gtk1 and so.

I have read the QT is far more efficient and that the only reason anyone 
uses GTK is for licensing reasons. Any comments? Also, not to mention 
that QT is fully portable to M$ Windows.

-- 

Tabor Kelly
tkelly-freebsd-questions at taborandtashell.net
http://tabor.taborandtashell.net