nfs server overload (nfsd)
Kris Kennaway
kris at obsecurity.org
Fri Dec 30 21:04:22 PST 2005
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 11:19:10AM +0100, Angel Blazquez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are expecting incredible overload in a NFS server. A top shows nfsd
> consuming most of the CPU:
>
> PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND
> 6000 root -8 0 1204K 660K biord 1 124:15 27.88% 27.88% nfsd
> 6002 root 4 0 1204K 660K *Giant 0 124:18 17.58% 17.58% nfsd
> 6006 root 4 0 1204K 660K *Giant 0 123:38 10.21% 10.21% nfsd
> 6005 root 4 0 1204K 660K *Giant 0 123:36 7.47% 7.47% nfsd
> 6003 root 4 0 1204K 660K *Giant 0 123:08 4.15% 4.15% nfsd
> 6001 root 4 0 1204K 660K *Giant 0 123:16 2.83% 2.83% nfsd
>
> Memory looks fine:
>
> Mem: 27M Active, 910M Inact, 136M Wired, 51M Cache, 112M Buf, 1828K Free
> Swap: 2048M Total, 72K Used, 2048M Free
>
> Typing in the nfs server (console/ssh) becomes terrible, the server does
> not reply well.
>
> We are running this nfs server in FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p23 on a Compaq
> Proliant server with a Compaq Smart Array 5300 that comunicates with a
> array of disks:
You will experience *much* better performance if you upgrade to 6.0.
Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20051231/055fcb3a/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list