what's the priority on building 5.1 packages?

[Kris Kennaway]

On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 03:29:51AM -0200, Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
>    Maybe this is not the best list to post this question,
> but it won't hurt. I've been compiling everything from source
> for lack of options, and was just wondering what should be the
> policy for 5.1 package-feeding, since the upgrade process has
> been described as very unstable at the present time.

What do you mean by "policy for 5.1 package-feeding"?

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20040123/f61a2b04/attachment.bin