UFS2 with Soft Updates Robust?
Damien Hull
dhull at digitaloverload.net
Wed Dec 22 21:57:13 PST 2004
On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 21:31 -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> John Conover wrote:
> > Is UFS2 with soft updates the most robust file system in freebsd?
>
> No, although UFS2 with softupdates is robust enough for production use.
>
> If you make the filesystem writes syncronous and disable write caching on the
> hard drive, you will improve the robustness at significant cost to performance.
>
Are you saying that the UFS2 file system sucks? If so what options does
one have?
I've read that softupdates should be turned on. How much of a
performance loss will I see if I turn softupates off?
--
Damien Hull <dhull at digitaloverload.net>
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list