why test(1) works with -eq but not -nq ?
Ian D. Leroux
ian_leroux at fastmail.fm
Wed Apr 21 07:32:45 PDT 2004
try -ne instead of -nq :-)
Ian
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 05:09:14PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Could somebody explain me why in the second case I get an error (both
> with test(1) and with sh's builtin) ?
>
> itetcu at it> /var/log/ports [16:51:38] 0
> # sh
> # cat ports_sup_log | wc -l
> 3
> # if [ "`cat ports_sup_log | wc -l`" -eq "3" ]; then echo 'da'; fi
> da
> # if [ "`cat ports_sup_log | wc -l`" -nq "3" ]; then echo 'da'; fi
> [: 3: unexpected operator
>
> # if (/bin/test "`cat ports_sup_log | wc -l`" -eq "3") ; then echo 'da'; fi
> da
> # if (/bin/test "`cat ports_sup_log | wc -l`" -nq "3") ; then echo 'da'; fi
> test: 3: unexpected operator
>
>
>
> --
> IOnut
> Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list