strange dump (dark matter?)
Dave McCammon
davemac11 at yahoo.com
Wed Oct 22 13:00:58 PDT 2003
--- Ryan Sandridge <ryan at sandridge.org> wrote:
> Hello all. I decided it was time to start doing
> backups. On Oct 7th,
> I did a full dump of /usr filesystem (among others),
> as such:
> # dump -0uan -f - /usr | gzip -7 >
> /tmp/20031007-usr-lvl0.dump.gz
>
> This seemed to work as expected, here is some info
> about the gz file:
> % gzip -l 20031007-usr-lvl0.dump.gz
> compressed uncompr. ratio uncompressed_name
> 507027476 1590855680 68.1% 20031007-usr-lvl0.dump
>
> Everything so far so good. Today (Oct 22) I tried
> an incremental dump,
> as such:
> # dump -5uan -f - /usr | gzip -7 >
> /tmp/20031022-usr-lvl5.dump.gz
>
> Here is where I start getting confused. While my
> other incremental
> backups today (/ and /var), seemed to be fine, the
> /usr dump was huge.
> Here is info about the gz file:
> % gzip -l 20031022-usr-lvl5.dump.gz
> compressed uncompr. ratio uncompressed_name
> 527112624 543600640 3.0% 20031022-usr-lvl5.dump
>
> This incremental backup is larger than the original
> full dump. Also
> notice that the compression ratio was 3.0%. When
> examining the list of
> files dumped, I don't see anything that could lead
> to a file size like
> this. A rough count shows that the backup should
> have been roughly
> 11MB uncompressed, compared to the 518MB
> uncompressed. I've tried
> reading up on both dump and gzip, but haven't found
> a clue. Perhaps
> I've discovered dark matter.
>
> Thanks,
> Ryan
Where is the file of your first backup stored?
Did it get backed up as part of the incremental
backup?
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list