Time Problem in 5.0
Bill Moran
wmoran at potentialtech.com
Fri Apr 25 12:54:10 PDT 2003
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Shantanu Mahajan <shantanoo at ieee.org> writes:
>>| Also, ntpdate is depreciated. You should be using ntpd with the
>>| proper switches/configuration.
>> ntpdate was working *perfectly* with
>> 4.7R,4.8-Stable.
>
>
> So? That's a significantly different version.
>
> Are you *sure* you want to be running 5.0?
> It doesn't sound like you're much of a debugger yourself, and it's not
> as though 5.x is recommended for anybody else yet...
I'm going to repeat myself here:
ntpdate is depreciated. The functionality in it is duplicated by ntpd.
It shouldn't even be in the 5.0 tree. I'm considering filing a pr to
request that it be removed. Opinions?
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list