[Bug 227862] devel/py-tox: update to 3.0.0
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Sat Jun 9 10:22:19 UTC 2018
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227862
--- Comment #4 from Kai <freebsd_ports at k-worx.org> ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #3)
Hello Kubilay,
thanks for committing the update. I'll rework a small rebased patch for the
DOCS option but I'm a little confused about the fact that there were some build
errors with the DOCS option enabled.
Maybe I'm still missing some QA testing technique and thus my workflow needs
some improvement? My usual way to do QA with the "make test" target for Python
ports is at the moment:
Testing the build process:
> poudriere testport -i -j JAIL -p PORTS -o PORT_TO_TEST
Inside the jail I do usually for Python ports (using py-tox as example with
FLAVOR=py27) with a already defined "do-test" target:
> cd /usr/ports/devel/py-tox
> make test
After these steps I check the logs for packages, that were missing or have been
fetched from PyPi.
You're right that both devel/py-pluggy + devel/py-py packages are not required
as DOCS_BUILD_DEPENDS to build the package successfully. But there will be some
warnings during the sphinx build process that these modules could not be
imported when they are left out, e.g:
> ImportError: No module named pluggy
> /wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/py-tox/work-py27/tox-3.0.0/doc/plugins.rst:89: > WARNING: autodoc: failed to import class u'TestenvConfig' from module u'tox.config'; the following exception was raised:
Can such warnings be safely ignored?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the freebsd-python
mailing list