Proposal: default to concurrent

[John W. O'Brien]

On 1/29/17 14:22, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 29 January 2017 at 11:08, John W. O'Brien <john at saltant.com> wrote:
>> Hello FreeBSD Python,
>> On the
>> other hand, there are lots of ports for which concurrent is a no-op, and
>> lots more that don't support python3 at all meaning that concurrent has
>> little to no chance to cause harm.
>>
>> What I propose is to enable the concurrent behavior by default and to
>> provide a feature to disable it when necessary.
> 
> 
> silly question but why is it an option in the first place?

Not at all silly. I can only guess at the answer though. Let's consult
its implementer [0].

[0] https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=356921

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-python/attachments/20170129/622ed8b5/attachment.sig>