[Bug 213636] math/py-matplotlib: Fails to build with python3

[bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213636

Kubilay Kocak <koobs at FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |needs-qa
             Status|New                         |Open
                 CC|                            |bdrewery at FreeBSD.org,
                   |                            |koobs at FreeBSD.org,
                   |                            |python at FreeBSD.org
           See Also|                            |https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
                   |                            |gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2146
                   |                            |00,
                   |                            |https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
                   |                            |gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2204
                   |                            |69
            Summary|math/py-matplotlib: fails   |math/py-matplotlib: Fails
                   |to build with python3       |to build with python3

--- Comment #8 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs at FreeBSD.org> ---
py3-ports are currently (and recently) only allowed with portmgr approval under
the following conditions:

- Port must be named category/py3-foo
- Port must be a *slave* port of an existing category/py-foo port
- Port must be *both* Python 2/3 compatible (USES=python), not just 3.4+, etc

Accordingly, I'd suggest making this issue about updating to the version
mentioned in comment 7

Producing a Python 3 version of the package in the official package
repositories will be handled shortly with a special version of poudriere that
automatically produces py3-* ports without them needing to exist in the tree.

Having said that, *if* the current version spec (python:2.7) is *incorrect*, in
that the current (port) version *does* support 3.x, then attachment 178422
should land, as the present version spec is actually incorrect (independent of
whether packages can be produced from it by poudriere or not).

Please advise whether the above is the case or not.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.